Emerine Eclips x Mack Snow pos het tremper/blizzard/eclipse

[KashMoneyExotics]

I was just wondering what would I get if I pair a Emerine Eclipse x Mack Snow pos het DB


If She is het:
Mack Snow Eclipse ( pos het tremper/blizzard)
Eclipses ( pos het tremper/blizzard)
Mack Snow 100% het eclipse (50% het tremper/eclipse)
Normal/Emerines ( varying amounts of color and pattern)


If she's not het:
Mack Snow 100% het eclipse (50% pos het tremper/blizzard)
Normals/Emerines 100% het eclipse (50% pos het tremper/eclipse)

Correct me if I’m wrong.

 

[Treefolk]

Ok, so assuming she is actually het, here are your possible outcomes (color cannot be factored):

1/16 eclipse
1/16 eclipse het blizzard
1/16 eclipse het tremper
1/16 eclipse het tremper, blizzard
1/16 Mack snow eclipse
1/16 Mack snow eclipse, het blizzard
1/16 Mack snow eclipse, het tremper
1/16 Mack snow eclipse, het tremper, blizzard
1/16 Mack snow het blizzard, eclipse
1/16 Mack snow het eclipse
1/16 Mack snow het tremper, blizzard, eclipse
1/16 Mack snow het tremper, eclipse
1/16 normal het blizzard, eclipse
1/16 Normal het eclipse
1/16 normal het tremper, blizzard, eclipse
1/16 normal het tremper, eclipse

Please use this in the future: Leopard Gecko Genetics Calculator It will save you time

 

[Treefolk]

I also would not make the pairing until you prove out the DB or not. You'll have some messy genetics to deal with after that. Your best pairings are going to be visual to visual or visual to het and if you have to, het to het; but non-het to het starts to get messy.

 

[KashMoneyExotics]

But I'll be trying to prove out the eclipse in that pairing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[VampyreByte]

But by doing that you'll have an even lower possible chance het Blizzard and Tremper. And all those would have to be proven for Bliz and Tremp.

 

[Treefolk]

But by doing that you'll have an even lower possible chance het Blizzard and Tremper. And all those would have to be proven for Bliz and Tremp.

This