Rhacodactyl
Member
- Messages
- 129
- Location
- West Virginia
I've never seen a comparison picture of a giant next to a normally sized gecko of the same age, so I thought some of you might find this useful. The RAPTOR is 8 months old and 63 grams, while the stripe (excuse her coloration, she's in shed) is just over a year old and 45 grams. So despite the fact that the giant is larger at a younger age, you can see she has a proportionately longer tail and torso as well. Also, despite the difference in overall size I'd say they're roughly equal in girth at this point and their heads are about the same size. I've heard super giants have larger heads as juveniles, but I can't comment on that from personal experience.
I've got 3 giants and the one normal-sized leo at the moment, so I think I'll get good measurements of each one's SVL and total length. I'd need to get more measurements of normally sized leos to make it more accurate, but I'm guessing there's a substantially different ratio of tail length to SVL or TL between normal and giant leos...so if we could work up a typical ratio range for normal and giant leos it'd probably be easier to tell giants from non-giants even as small juveniles. What do you guys think?
I've got 3 giants and the one normal-sized leo at the moment, so I think I'll get good measurements of each one's SVL and total length. I'd need to get more measurements of normally sized leos to make it more accurate, but I'm guessing there's a substantially different ratio of tail length to SVL or TL between normal and giant leos...so if we could work up a typical ratio range for normal and giant leos it'd probably be easier to tell giants from non-giants even as small juveniles. What do you guys think?
