Has anyone made a Styrofoam (or other type) homemade incubator and used a Thermostat ___AND___ Rheostat?
I am temp-testing a homemade Styrofoam incubator, using just the Rheostat for now:
1 styrofoam cooler
1 4"x6" rubbermaid, lid closed, filled with water
1 10-20gal zoo-med UTH, inside cooler, under the rubbermaid.
1 Rheostat
2 Digital temp probes, 1 inside cooler, 1 outside cooler (roomtemps)
(If you have to buy all these components, the $40-50 cost is comparable to a cheap incubator, but I had most of this, found some used, and REALLLLY want something with a "fail-safe")
-----------------------------------------
I am maintaining an accurate incubation temp of 83-F (actually 82-84F) in a room with temps that vary between 72 -> 78F, depending on our preference for room temp.
In our virtually temp-stable room (no extremes), the incubation temp is stable. But my question is, for those who have tried:
---------------
Is it better to set the Rheostat, and use the Thermostat as an "overheat turnoff failsafe" (set about 2-3 degrees above preferred temp)?
or
Is it better to set the Thermostat to the desired incubation temp, and set the Rheostat to prevent "runaway high temps" if the thermostat fails?
---------------
I am thinking that using the Thermostat as the "failsafe" and the Rheostat as the "active temp controller" will maintain a more stable temp with less variation (in a room with NO extremes).
Opinions? Experience from anyone who has tried either method? I want the most stable temp (without the cost of Proportional).
I am temp-testing a homemade Styrofoam incubator, using just the Rheostat for now:
1 styrofoam cooler
1 4"x6" rubbermaid, lid closed, filled with water
1 10-20gal zoo-med UTH, inside cooler, under the rubbermaid.
1 Rheostat
2 Digital temp probes, 1 inside cooler, 1 outside cooler (roomtemps)
(If you have to buy all these components, the $40-50 cost is comparable to a cheap incubator, but I had most of this, found some used, and REALLLLY want something with a "fail-safe")
-----------------------------------------
I am maintaining an accurate incubation temp of 83-F (actually 82-84F) in a room with temps that vary between 72 -> 78F, depending on our preference for room temp.
In our virtually temp-stable room (no extremes), the incubation temp is stable. But my question is, for those who have tried:
---------------
Is it better to set the Rheostat, and use the Thermostat as an "overheat turnoff failsafe" (set about 2-3 degrees above preferred temp)?
or
Is it better to set the Thermostat to the desired incubation temp, and set the Rheostat to prevent "runaway high temps" if the thermostat fails?
---------------
I am thinking that using the Thermostat as the "failsafe" and the Rheostat as the "active temp controller" will maintain a more stable temp with less variation (in a room with NO extremes).
Opinions? Experience from anyone who has tried either method? I want the most stable temp (without the cost of Proportional).