my sunglow novas were produced from a male enigma het for nothing x tremper sunglow het eclipse.
Maybe the Enigma was het RAPTOR, and the Sunglow was het Eclipse? That could make a Nova.
but this year the male enigma is going in with the same sunglow female, a bell hybino, and one of my super snows
By breeding the male Enigma to a Sunglow het Eclipse and producing Novas you have proven him to be het Tremper and Eclipse (RAPTOR). Breeding him to a Bell will produce unnecessary het Bell poss het Tremper offspring.
since none of his previous offspring when paired up with non het females produced any eclipse traits, could it be possible that the female is the het raptor? this is so tricky when you haven't paired them yourself. im going strictly by his records of course. i don't want to breed him to a bell if he's het tremper.
since none of his previous offspring when paired up with non het females produced any eclipse traits, could it be possible that the female is the het raptor? this is so tricky when you haven't paired them yourself. im going strictly by his records of course. i don't want to breed him to a bell if he's het tremper.
So I was correct. The enigma has to be het RAPTOR, and the sunglow het eclipse. I am SO getting the hang of this! :main_thumbsup:
A het Eclipse paired to a non-het can't produce Eclipses, that test proves nothing. Both the sire and dame must be het Eclipse or homozygous Eclipse to produce Eclipse offspring. The same holds true for any recessive trait.