A Couple New BP Pics

robin

New Member
Messages
12,261
Location
Texas
I try not to go cheap or boring with breeding. If I'm going to do it, I usually go all out. I'm not buying anything super expensive, but I already have a female pinstripe on hold. I'm also thinking about getting a cinnamon female. Maybe a lesser, but I'm not sure. I love the bee combo morphs.:)

i am not saying go cheap but you could make some more bee's with a normal female or two. it will also give you an idea if you can breed ball pythons . believe it or not many people can't.
 

SFgeckos

New Member
Messages
842
Location
CA
"I try not to go cheap or boring with breeding. If I'm going to do it, I usually go all out."

I totally understand Kristi! Ball pythons and reptiles in general are quite addicting! I started with a pair of het albinos in '04 and slowly built my bp collection. I wasn't trying to imply anything negative with my comment, I was only thinking about how I started my own projects with co-dom males using multiple normal females to increase clutch number and total egg count. It's always fun because you'll never know what pops out. One clutch I did bumblebee x normal= 6 eggs, 4 of which were bees!

In my opinion, reptile eggs hatching is never boring! =)

Good luck this season!
Jon
 

Autra

New Member
Messages
155
Location
Houston, TX
Ugh.

I keep coming back and looking at the pics, and it's getting harder and harder to not make a call or two to get one or two.

I think my wife would kill me if I got any snakes right now though.

Stupid pretty snakes. Haha
 

T-ReXx

Uroplatus Fanatic
Messages
1,745
Location
Buffalo, NY
How is using normal females "cheap?" Most breeders use big normal girls with codom males as part of their breeding strategy. Not everyone can afford 5 pastel females for every male(though replacing all normal females with pastels eventually is my plan) and buying adult girls let's you get a jump on the breeding process while waiting for younger morph girls to grow to size. As far as I'm concerned, breeding a bumblebee(or even better a killer) to 5 normal girls > breeding him to one or two morphs. Gotta play the odds.

I love my normie girls, they're all pretty and special in their own ways. :p

Ugh.

I keep coming back and looking at the pics, and it's getting harder and harder to not make a call or two to get one or two.

I think my wife would kill me if I got any snakes right now though.

Stupid pretty snakes. Haha

DO IT! :main_laugh: Balls are awesome, and snakes are so easy compared to lizards it ridiculous. :main_yes:
 

Autra

New Member
Messages
155
Location
Houston, TX
DO IT! :main_laugh: Balls are awesome, and snakes are so easy compared to lizards it ridiculous. :main_yes:

Stupid craigslist...

I can get a young-ish normal ball and a 20L for about $75.

Anyway, enough thread-jacking.

Thanks for nothing, bro. :p
 

eric

OREGON GECKO
Messages
3,466
Location
Oregon
Kristi I think with the two snakes you have now will give you unbelievable hatchlings!

male Bee x female pastel=
1/8 normals(wild types) 1/8 spiders 1/8 super pastel 1/8 killer bees 2/8 bee 2/8 pastel.
male Bee x normal(wild type)=
1/4 normal(wild type) 1/4 spider 1/4 pastel 1/4 Bee

Breeding a normal to Bee in this case would, IMO, be a step back for a small hobbyist like ourselves. Compare the two possible outcomes from the two. Again IMO (don't want to step on toes here) there is no contest which one has better potential.
But, with that said, if all you have is a couple Co-doms or dominant morphs and Normals(wild types) those breeding's can't be seen as a bad thing or a step back because we all start somewhere, but in Kristi (The Eclipse Queen's) case she doesn't have this issue.

Bigger breeders need those lower end snakes to fill the request and demand for entry level snake owners who might not be able to afford a higher end multiple gene snake. Breeding co-dom or dominant snakes to normals makes more financial sense in their case. More morphs out of one breeding. Just makes more sense. Just my two cents!:D
 

SFgeckos

New Member
Messages
842
Location
CA
Great post Eric and I agree with your points about breeding potential. If the goal is to produce the best ratio of genetic mutations, then of course the use of normals would not be beneficial.

However, speaking from strictly my OWN experiences with ball pythons, the more females used for co-dom projects (normal or otherwise) the greater the odds of producing offspring. Those of us that have bred bps for a few generations know that you will have some bps go off feed for months (I have several stuck at the 500g range, and some at the 1000g range), picky/problem feeders (I have a few who only prefer mice, which can take 3-5yrs to reach adult size), you will have females that don't ovulate (I try to palpate and ultrasound for follicles but I'm not perfect), males that aren't interested in females, small clutches/infertile clutches, etc etc. So even though the genetic "possible" potentials are great with a single pair or two, what happens if say the female doesn't ovulate or the male refuses to copulate with that particular female?

Just my thoughts and experiences.

Jon
 
Last edited:

robin

New Member
Messages
12,261
Location
Texas
Kristi I think with the two snakes you have now will give you unbelievable hatchlings!

male Bee x female pastel=
1/8 normals(wild types) 1/8 spiders 1/8 super pastel 1/8 killer bees 2/8 bee 2/8 pastel.
male Bee x normal(wild type)=
1/4 normal(wild type) 1/4 spider 1/4 pastel 1/4 Bee

Breeding a normal to Bee in this case would, IMO, be a step back for a small hobbyist like ourselves. Compare the two possible outcomes from the two. Again IMO (don't want to step on toes here) there is no contest which one has better potential.
But, with that said, if all you have is a couple Co-doms or dominant morphs and Normals(wild types) those breeding's can't be seen as a bad thing or a step back because we all start somewhere, but in Kristi (The Eclipse Queen's) case she doesn't have this issue.

Bigger breeders need those lower end snakes to fill the request and demand for entry level snake owners who might not be able to afford a higher end multiple gene snake. Breeding co-dom or dominant snakes to normals makes more financial sense in their case. More morphs out of one breeding. Just makes more sense. Just my two cents!:D

picking up a couple of adult normal females could be a way to know if she wants to or can breed ball pythons, until her morph females grow up (generally three winters) or until she may have a grand or few to pick up an adult morph.
i know i love keeping ball pythons, i kept them for several years but i never bred them. now i want to see if i can breed them. i am starting out with good quality male morphs and a few female normals just to see if i can also later this year i plan on picking up some double and triple morph females to pair with my males in a few years. even if i can not breed balls i sure do appreciate a beautiful ball python and will continue to keep them normals and all :)


p.s. there is a reason why healthy adult normal female ball pythons are not real easy to find. no body wants to let go of them haha (well unless they are replacing normals with morphs). this isn't like leopard geckos.
 

eric

OREGON GECKO
Messages
3,466
Location
Oregon
Great points Jon! I totally agree, Normals(wild-type)will all ways have a place in breeding, like you stated sometimes the situation calls for it, but in Kristi's situation purchasing an Adult Normal(wild-type) female to breed to see if she likes it is not only a waste of money but pointless, IMO, when she has a potential mate in her daughters female pastel. And again really great points Jon!:main_thumbsup:

@ Robin, your love and passion for Ball Pythons is shared by most, including myself. And your absolutely right, the beauty these snakes bring and joy is priceless. My only point was why buy a normal(wild-type) when she has a potential mate already, that genetically will give her a more diverse group of hatchlings and cost her nothing? Like you stated finding a breedable Normal(wild-type) female is extremely hard if not down right impossible to find, especially this time of year.

And I think I understand the leo comment.:D
 

Kristi23

Ghoulish Geckos
Messages
16,180
Location
IL
What I meant by cheap is that I don't want to make a lot of snakes that I can already afford to buy. I'm hoping to have good odds and make the ones I can't buy. If breeding doesn't work out, I'll have some gorgeous morphs to look at. Plus, I'm in no hurry to start breeding and I don't want to go huge. I only want one or two breeding groups. I have my geckos to keep me busy.:)
 

Roaming Reptiles

Brandon Fowler
Messages
766
Location
Bakersfeild
picking up a couple of adult normal females could be a way to know if she wants to or can breed ball pythons, until her morph females grow up (generally three winters) or until she may have a grand or few to pick up an adult morph.
i know i love keeping ball pythons, i kept them for several years but i never bred them. now i want to see if i can breed them. i am starting out with good quality male morphs and a few female normals just to see if i can also later this year i plan on picking up some double and triple morph females to pair with my males in a few years. even if i can not breed balls i sure do appreciate a beautiful ball python and will continue to keep them normals and all :)


p.s. there is a reason why healthy adult normal female ball pythons are not real easy to find. no body wants to let go of them haha (well unless they are replacing normals with morphs). this isn't like leopard geckos.

I didnt know you had Ball pythons for yrs. Cool;)
 

T-ReXx

Uroplatus Fanatic
Messages
1,745
Location
Buffalo, NY
Great post Eric and I agree with your points about breeding potential. If the goal is to produce the best ratio of genetic mutations, then of course the use of normals would not be beneficial.

However, speaking from strictly my OWN experiences with ball pythons, the more females used for co-dom projects (normal or otherwise) the greater the odds of producing offspring. Those of us that have bred bps for a few generations know that you will have some bps go off feed for months (I have several stuck at the 500g range, and some at the 1000g range), picky/problem feeders (I have a few who only prefer mice, which can take 3-5yrs to reach adult size), you will have females that don't ovulate (I try to palpate and ultrasound for follicles but I'm not perfect), males that aren't interested in females, small clutches/infertile clutches, etc etc. So even though the genetic "possible" potentials are great with a single pair or two, what happens if say the female doesn't ovulate or the male refuses to copulate with that particular female?

Just my thoughts and experiences.

Jon

I agree with this 100%. Like Robin I've kept balls for years before(hell, I've kept all kinds a herps) but never bred them. Ball breeders will tell you that locks are easy to get, eggs not so much. My previous experience is with Burm and Retic breeding and those guys are considered easier to get clutches from than balls and I still had plenty of girls who wouldn't produce or were unable to breed a particular season for one reason or another. I agree that for those of us who don't necessarily care as much if we get a clutch or not every season have less of a reason to utilize normals than those of us who are looking for a larger clutch yield right off the bat. And I agree that breeding morph male A X morph female B is generally considered better than morph male A X normal female B. However, IMO, I'd rather cross a genetic powerhouse male with 5 normal girls and get a higher potential of actually getting eggs than that same male to a single genetically "superior" girl and put all my eggs in one basket(pun intended :p). But then, I'm also looking to take a different approach and go for quantity base and two gene morphs first and then refine with holdback morph females later on. Either strategy works well I think, it's just a matter of personal preference and how many snakes you actually want to house and feed. If I were still breeding leopard geckos, I'd probably think differently due to space requirements. ;)

Either way, I think the pairing is a good one and wish you luck with them! :main_thumbsup:
 

robin

New Member
Messages
12,261
Location
Texas
I didnt know you had Ball pythons for yrs. Cool;)

yup kept them for about 7 years before i had my corneal transplants. when i had to get rid of everything. geckos, locality boas, several species of python, colubrids and probably some stuff i forgot about 60 snakes in total though (maybe more lol)
 

robin

New Member
Messages
12,261
Location
Texas
I agree with this 100%. Like Robin I've kept balls for years before(hell, I've kept all kinds a herps) but never bred them. Ball breeders will tell you that locks are easy to get, eggs not so much. My previous experience is with Burm and Retic breeding and those guys are considered easier to get clutches from than balls and I still had plenty of girls who wouldn't produce or were unable to breed a particular season for one reason or another. I agree that for those of us who don't necessarily care as much if we get a clutch or not every season have less of a reason to utilize normals than those of us who are looking for a larger clutch yield right off the bat. And I agree that breeding morph male A X morph female B is generally considered better than morph male A X normal female B. However, IMO, I'd rather cross a genetic powerhouse male with 5 normal girls and get a higher potential of actually getting eggs than that same male to a single genetically "superior" girl and put all my eggs in one basket(pun intended :p). But then, I'm also looking to take a different approach and go for quantity base and two gene morphs first and then refine with holdback morph females later on. Either strategy works well I think, it's just a matter of personal preference and how many snakes you actually want to house and feed. If I were still breeding leopard geckos, I'd probably think differently due to space requirements. ;)

Either way, I think the pairing is a good one and wish you luck with them! :main_thumbsup:


ima be rotating my citrus and my lesser. maybe i will get lucky and get babies from both :p
 

Kristi23

Ghoulish Geckos
Messages
16,180
Location
IL
I definitely understand what everyone is saying. For me, I don't want a ton of eggs, so it's no big deal if my females don't lay. I really just wanted something that was more of a challenge to breed than geckos. Plus I love all the morphs.

I just made my second payment on my pinstripe female. She should be paid off in about a week.:D
 

SFgeckos

New Member
Messages
842
Location
CA
Nice! Pinstripes are nice snakes!

Not trying to stir up too much debate, but since I was feeding some of my normal females tonight- here's a great example of using a normal female to produce morphs for "trade value" in building your collection.

I have a high blushing normal 2500+ gram female, who has produced 8 eggs per clutch the last 4 years. Each year she was bred to a different co-dom male, so out of those 32 total eggs she has produced 17 visual morphs. 7 females I held back for my own collection, the other 10 visual morphs were traded to obtain other visual morphs I didn't have. So basically, with this $50 normal female I got 6 years ago, I've been able to acquire other mutations I wanted without ever spending money to purchase them (I'm not counting the time/labor and feeding cost). In addition, because she has high blushing sides, the offspring she produces often acquire similar phenotypic traits (high blushing mojaves, high blushing lessers, etc). She's "only" a normal but she's definitely special in my collection!

Jon
 

Visit our friends

Top