Darcpixie
New Member
- Messages
- 41
For me, Enigmas seem to have a trade-off that is valuable to the hobby of reptile keeping, specifically the desire that many have to interact with their scaley friends. From reading about everyone's enigmas, I have noticed a common trend -- increased friendliness/handlability. My enigma, an adorable Enigma Tremper het Blizzard, is THE calmest, easiest to handle gecko. Will sit on your hand, respirations are normal, and will climb around, slowly, but with no real frenetic, distressed, quick motions.
Isn't this a trait to breed FOR? Aren't we making the gecko better for the pet trade by increasing the likelihood that the new owner will be able to safely and confidently handle this calmer gecko, and thereby, perhaps, improve the future care for this animal?
As someone with 22 snakes, with 4 years experience owning/breeding reptiles, many people who admire herps may not get one, not get it out, feed it less if it is a spastic critter, whereas the more docile, easy to handle, "predictable" animals are quite popular, and quite frequently handled. (Ball pythons, anyone? )
I previously had an adorable spider ball python, who seems to have the closest analogue to the enigma trait. The general consensus, and one I am generally comfortable with, is if it eats, drinks, poops, and copulates, then I'll give it a chance. This is much easier to do with snakes in my opinion (shed can't stick to toes!), but it is a philosophy I am applying to my Leopard Geckos. Mister E., my enigma (harhar bad pun I know) will be a pet for ME, even if he is not placed with our girls.
I just don't think that enigmas with the syndrome have nothing to offer the community, and would hope that a mere explanation of quirks and the ability to evaluate your animals for if their issues prevent the eat, drink, poop and copulate qualifications would suffice for us to further a group that is, most importantly to me, a FINE pet animal that will keep people interested in the hobby, and secondarily is a very neat quasi-paradox animal.
I wonder if not breeding to reduce syndrome, but instead breeding for the increased, non-stressed, handlability of our animals would increase or decrease the syndrome? I mean, we are breeding for PET animals here, they do not have to replicate wild behaviors in order to survive, let alone thrive, in our care. Anything, like any domesticated animal, that makes our pets more likely to be held/loved/anthropomorphized can only increase its popularity and, let's face it, success in individual homes.
Something to think about.
/goes back to work.
Isn't this a trait to breed FOR? Aren't we making the gecko better for the pet trade by increasing the likelihood that the new owner will be able to safely and confidently handle this calmer gecko, and thereby, perhaps, improve the future care for this animal?
As someone with 22 snakes, with 4 years experience owning/breeding reptiles, many people who admire herps may not get one, not get it out, feed it less if it is a spastic critter, whereas the more docile, easy to handle, "predictable" animals are quite popular, and quite frequently handled. (Ball pythons, anyone? )
I previously had an adorable spider ball python, who seems to have the closest analogue to the enigma trait. The general consensus, and one I am generally comfortable with, is if it eats, drinks, poops, and copulates, then I'll give it a chance. This is much easier to do with snakes in my opinion (shed can't stick to toes!), but it is a philosophy I am applying to my Leopard Geckos. Mister E., my enigma (harhar bad pun I know) will be a pet for ME, even if he is not placed with our girls.
I just don't think that enigmas with the syndrome have nothing to offer the community, and would hope that a mere explanation of quirks and the ability to evaluate your animals for if their issues prevent the eat, drink, poop and copulate qualifications would suffice for us to further a group that is, most importantly to me, a FINE pet animal that will keep people interested in the hobby, and secondarily is a very neat quasi-paradox animal.
I wonder if not breeding to reduce syndrome, but instead breeding for the increased, non-stressed, handlability of our animals would increase or decrease the syndrome? I mean, we are breeding for PET animals here, they do not have to replicate wild behaviors in order to survive, let alone thrive, in our care. Anything, like any domesticated animal, that makes our pets more likely to be held/loved/anthropomorphized can only increase its popularity and, let's face it, success in individual homes.
Something to think about.
/goes back to work.