N
nicolenadia
Guest
Her tail underside is nutz.....i have never seen the color go on the underside. Shes is 3 months.
LeosForLess said:WOW does it really look like that or is it the camera?
So the gecko looks like that? The sink looked white sort of, lolnicolenadia said:She really is that bright under normal light. She had just shed a few hours before, but yeah the flash intensifies the color especially on light blue sink.
lol no, its just that i thought the sink was blue and there was somthing with your cameranicolenadia said:Do you think Im up to some sort of "trickery"?.....the sink is a very pale blue....water reflects light...flashes bounce off of non pourus shiney surfaces...i'll photographer her in front of the window tomorrow with "natural" sunlight....then you can poke fun at me all you want when you see she looks the same.
nicolenadia said:I really don't think I would get a hard time from any of you if I had bought her from somene on this forum, but since she was found at Petco..."oh no, it can't be real"....YES, she really is that bright..
No I have manual white balance....I just took a quick snap on auto with the on the camera flash. I didn't have the time to get my real camera and flash , and bounce the light or set up my strobes...I only took her pic because I was quickly getting a pic of these injured geckos that i posted in another post. The camera I use every day for my job is a Canon 20d. I have a small little elf I use for stuff like this. I'll remember now not to post pictures anymore, since I keep getting a hard time....
I went to college for 4 years for photojournalism... this is only a forum, so I didn't expect to get a bunch of wannabe photo editors getting on my case....jeeze
Also, everyones monitors are calibrated differently. I have a new MAC cinema display, and if you don't, its not going to look the same.
I never said that you doctored it...nicolenadia said:What it comes down to is, 2 of you made it seem like I had doctored the photo and it hurt my feelings....I didn't pull out all the stops on that photo, it was a quick 2 sec photo and I get a hard time about it like I made it up. Im assuming you have a PC....Different monitors have different calibration settings...do you work in RGB or CMYK....seriously, your post screamed, "My poo smells better than yours". Undertsand how that made me feel and the fact that I defend myself, now you make me feel something is wrong with defending myself, like Im a 12 year old for doing so. Do you want the PSD file so you can check out the histograms? YES, peoples monitors look different...different brands produce different results. I don't know why you think your monitor is superior, and you act like mine is a peice of junk. I already said like 3 times, I used a straight flash...i didn't bounce it, I didn't diffuse it, and I didn't softbox strobe it....It is a straight on and I never once said it was perfect....
I didn't just fabricate the gecko. If you look at the top photo, the geckos colors are still bright yet my hand looks as normal as it always does. if I had jacked up the satuation or bumped up contrast, my hand would have gone blood red.....All i did was crop low res for screen viewing.
You don't have to be a scientist to know why the sink looks so light....THE WATER...light refraction....light bouncing off of shiney ceramic....I didn't bounce the on camera flash off of the celing.Its not an SLR, its just a point and shoot. I was giving her a soak to get the skin off her toes.....i didn't set up all my stuff.