R
reptidude1
Guest
^
Wait, why are supers better? Nutritionally they seem about the same as mealworms, does the size factor make that huge of a difference?
Let's say a large superworm is equal to five medium mealworms
Eating five mealworms would give a leo five shares of chitin (skin/exoskeleton) along with five shares of the good stuff (the protein, vitamins, and moisture)
Eating one mealworm would give a leo one, slightly smaller share of chitin than the 5 mealworms combined, and one share of "the good stuff" just over the equivalent of the five shares of mealies.
They're not nutritionally better (especially if they're gutloaded with the same things) but they have more of what's needed and less of what isn't![]()