lillith
lillith's leo lovables
- Messages
- 1,923
- Location
- Land of the Rain and Trees, WA
...maybe I should have used the word polygenic instead of multiple alleles.
Thanks, Nevin.
Thanks, Nevin.
thats what im saying. The term 'raptor' doesn't always work. A raptor is defined as a patternless gecko with red eyes, but that isnt often what people label as raptor. ive been a fan of saying eclipse tremper since i first got into leopard geckos, but that doesnt always work either... but now we are getting into something completely different.
i appreciate your opinion.... your giant bell posts are always a treat.
I really feel like calling a homozygous eclipse animal an aptor isnt doing that animal justice, regardless of what the eyes look like.
Ok now i agree that RAPTOR TO RAPTOR does not give you 100% raptors, atleast this is what i have found out since breeding these guys since they hit the market. But here is another tid bit of info,,,Every APTOR i have worked with has been 100% het for eclipse...Marker at work here????
well the problem is people are calling banded, jungle stripe etc. raptors just because they're a tremper albino eclipse, there is a lot of debate to this and some as myself do not consider them raptors, the only raptors i sell are actual patternless and red eyed, anythign else, patterned or aptors will go for lower because to me, they're not true raptors. just because something is eclipse and albino (which gives red eyes) doesnt' mean it's a raptor.
Wow this thread took off! I am learning so much! I have another ? What would be the outcome of mack raptor x aptor...
i am going to say that as a majorety a full RAPTOR X full RAPTOR will result 98% of the time in full RAPTORs. that other 2% is the time when you get all the other stuff. i wouldnt say it would take a "very special pair" as you had said thad.
merlin, the outcome would bee the same as a RAPTOR by snow RAPTOR just with different percentages because an APTOR would only be het RAPTOR