Jeremy Letkey said:Well the parents are...
male = Mack RW 100% het Patty and the female Mack 100% het RW and 100% het Patty.
So this is in "MY OPINION" either a Super Snow RW 100% het for patternless or a Super Snow RWPA.
Jeremy Letkey said:Hey Gregg, if I look through a shoebox, while standing on my head when the moon is full and I close one eye, I can see Uranus.![]()
Jeremy Letkey said:Well the parents are...
male = Mack RW 100% het Patty and the female Mack 100% het RW and 100% het Patty.
So this is in "MY OPINION" either a Super Snow RW 100% het for patternless or a Super Snow RWPA. It hatched with no patterning at all. It is now 12 days old and does have a few faint splotches around the neck area. This is making me lean toward SSRW het patty but I'm not certain.
Before you state anything other than an opinion in this thread... please have 100% factual data and visual evidence to back it. lol :main_rolleyes:
Has anyone for certain produced a SSRWPA?
Gazz said:I don't think it's a visual albino the eyes look way to black.Looks to me a mack super snow patternless het RW.being a non albino it would be darker grey color if it was a standed mack super snow at that age.Just my opinion.
preacherman said:Have you tried asking it what it is?
Golden Gate Geckos said:I'm certainly not a genetics expert, and I haven't a clue what it is, what it looks like, what it's supposed to look like.. nor do I have an opinion. Well... OK. My opinion is that is needs some fur on it.
Golden Gate Geckos said:My opinion is that is needs some fur on it.