As of Oct. 1st - CT's Banned List

[Justyn20003]

General Assembly File No. 516
January Session, 2009 Substitute House Bill No. 6552
House of Representatives, April 6, 2009

The Committee on Environment reported through REP. ROY, R. of the 119th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.

AN ACT BANNING THE POSSESSION OF POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS ANIMALS AND THE IMPORTATION, POSSESSION AND LIBERATION OF WILD ANIMALS.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

Section 1. (NEW) (Effective October 1, 2009) (a) No person shall operate, provide, sell, use or offer to operate, provide, sell or use any computer software or service in this state that allows a person, when not physically present, to remotely control a firearm or weapon to hunt a live animal or bird.

(b) Any person who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor.
Sec. 2. Section 26-40a of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2009):

(a) No person shall possess a potentially dangerous animal. For the purposes of this section, the following wildlife, or any hybrid thereof, shall be considered [as] potentially dangerous animals:

(1) The felidae, including, but not limited to, the lion, leopard, cheetah, jaguar, ocelot, jaguarundi cat, puma, lynx, [and] bobcat, [the] tiger, serval, caracal, jungle cat and Savannah cat;

(2) The canidae, including, but not limited to, the wolf, [and] coyote and fox; [and the]

(3) The ursidae, including, but not limited to, the black bear, grizzly bear and brown bear;

(4) The hominidae, including, but not limited to, the gorilla, chimpanzee and orangutan;

(5) The hylobatidae, including, but not limited to, the gibbon or "lesser ape";

(6) The cercopithecidae, including, but not limited to, the baboon and macaque;

(7) The macropodidae, including, but not limited to, the kangaroo and wallaby;

(8) The mustelidae, including, but not limited to, the wolverine;

(9) The hyaenidae, including, but not limited to, the hyaena;

(10) The elephantidae, including, but not limited to, the hippopotamidae, including the hippopotamus;

(11) The rhinocerotidae, including, but not limited to, the rhinoceros;

(12) The suidae, including, but not limited to, the warthog;

(13) The alligatoridae, including, but not limited to, the alligator and caiman;

(14) The crocodylidae, including, but not limited to, the crocodile;

(15) The gavialidae, including, but not limited to, the gavial;

(16) The elapidae, including, but not limited to, cobras, coral snakes and mambas;

(17) The viperidae, including, but not limited to, copperheads, rattlesnakes, cottonmouths and all other adders and vipers;

(18) The rear-fanged members of the colubridae in the genera lothornis, boiga, thelotornis, thabdophis, enhydris, dispholidus, clelia, rhabdophis, hydrodynastes, philodryas and malpolon;

(19) The Burmese/Indian, African Rock, amethystine and reticulated of the pythonidae;

(20) The green, yellow and dark spotted anacondas of the boidae;

(21) The helodermatidae, including, but not limited to, Gila monsters and beaded lizards; and

(22) The Nile monitor, water monitor, black-throat monitor, white-throat monitor, crocodile monitor and komodo dragon of the varanidae.

[No person shall possess a potentially dangerous animal.]

(b) Any such animal illegally possessed may be ordered seized and may be relocated or disposed of as determined by the Commissioner of Environmental Protection. The Department of Environmental Protection shall issue a bill to the owner or person in illegal possession of such potentially dangerous animal for all costs of seizure, care, maintenance, [and] relocation or disposal of such animal. Additionally, any person who violates any provision of this section shall be assessed a civil penalty not to exceed [one] two thousand dollars, to be fixed by the court, for each offense. Each violation shall be a separate and distinct offense and in the case of a continuing violation, each day's continuance thereof shall be deemed to be a separate and distinct offense. The Commissioner of Environmental Protection may request the Attorney General to institute an action in Superior Court to recover such penalty and any amounts owed pursuant to a bill issued in accordance with this section and for an order providing such equitable and injunctive relief as the court deems appropriate.

(c) The provisions of this section shall not apply to municipal parks, zoos [and] accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums or the Zoological Association of America, public nonprofit aquaria, nature centers, [or] museums [,] or laboratories and research facilities maintained by scientific or educational institutions [;] registered with the United States Department of Agriculture or to a person possessing a Bengal cat certified by an internationally recognized multiple-cat domestic feline breeding association as being without wild parentage for a minimum of four prior generations which cat was registered with the Commissioner of Agriculture on or before October 1, 1996, provided no such cat may be imported into this state after June 6, 1996. [; or to persons possessing animals legally on or before May 23, 1983.] In any action taken by any official of the state or any municipality to control rabies, a Bengal cat shall be considered not vaccinated for rabies in accordance with accepted veterinary practice.

(d) Any person who wilfully violates any provision of subsection (a) of this section shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor.
Sec. 3. Section 26-55 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof

 

[Justyn20003]

Effective October 1, 2009):
[No] (a) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, no person shall import or introduce into the state, or possess or liberate therein, any live fish, wild bird, wild mammal, reptile, amphibian or invertebrate unless such person has obtained a permit therefor from the commissioner. [, provided nothing in this section shall be construed to require such permit for any primate species that weighs not more than fifty pounds at maturity that was imported or possessed in the state prior to October 1, 2003.] Such permit may be issued at the discretion of the commissioner under such regulations as the commissioner may prescribe. The commissioner may by regulation prescribe the numbers of live fish, wild birds, wild mammals, reptiles, amphibians or invertebrates of certain species which may be imported, possessed, introduced into the state or liberated therein. The commissioner may by regulation exempt certain species or groups of live fish from the permit requirements. The commissioner may by regulation determine which species of wild birds, wild mammals, reptiles, amphibians or invertebrates must meet permit requirements. The commissioner may totally prohibit the importation, possession, introduction into the state or liberation therein of certain species which the commissioner has determined may be a potential threat to humans, agricultural crops or established species of plants, fish, birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians or invertebrates. The commissioner may by regulation exempt from permit requirements organizations or institutions such as municipal parks, zoos, laboratories and research [laboratories, colleges or universities] facilities maintained by scientific or educational institutions, museums, public nonprofit aquaria or nature centers where live fish, wild birds, wild mammals, reptiles, amphibians or invertebrates are held in strict confinement.

(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, the importation and possession of the following species is prohibited:
(1) Any primate in the families cheirogaleidae, lemuridae, lepilemuridae, indriidae, lorisidae, loris, daubentoniidae, galagidae, galago, tarsiidae, callitrichidae, cebidae, pitheciidae or atelidae;

(2) the sciuridae, including, but not limited to, the prairie dog;

(3) the viverridae, including, but not limited to, the civet and genet;

(4) any venomous species in the family arachnidea, including, but not limited to, the tarantula and scorpion; and

(5) any poisonous species in the family dendrobatidae, including, but not limited to, poison arrow frogs.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this section, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection may issue a permit for the possession of a service primate to a permanently disabled person with a severe mobility impairment, provided such disabled person submits written certification to said commissioner:

(1) From a licensed medical doctor attesting to such disabled person’s disability, mobility impairment and the need for a service primate to provide an essential function that cannot be performed by the disabled person;

(2) that such service primate was legally obtained, is from the genus Cebus and is trained by an accredited service primate training organization; and

(3) that the organization furnishing the service primate to the disabled person is a nonprofit organization and is in compliance with all applicable federal and state animal welfare laws.

(d) Any such fish, bird, mammal, reptile, amphibian or invertebrate illegally imported into the state or illegally possessed therein [shall] may be seized by any representative of the Department of Environmental Protection and [shall] may be relocated or disposed of as determined by the commissioner. [Any person, except as provided in section 26-55a, who violates any provision of this section or any regulation issued by the commissioner as provided in this section shall be guilty of an infraction. Importation, liberation or possession of each fish, wild bird, wild mammal, reptile, amphibian or invertebrate in violation of this section or such regulation shall be a separate and distinct offense and, in the case of a continuing violation, each day of continuance thereof shall be deemed to be a separate and distinct offense.] The Department of Environmental Protection shall issue a bill to the owner or person in illegal possession of such animal for all costs of seizure, care, maintenance, relocation or disposal for such animal.

(e) Any person who violates any provision of this section or any regulation adopted by the commissioner pursuant to this section shall be assessed a civil penalty not to exceed one thousand dollars, to be fixed by the court, for each offense. Each violation shall be a separate and distinct offense. In the case of a continuing violation, each day's continuance thereof shall be deemed to be a separate and distinct offense. The Commissioner of Environmental Protection may request the Attorney General to institute an action in Superior Court to recover such civil penalty and any amounts owed pursuant to a bill issued in accordance with subsection (d) of this section and for an order providing such equitable and injunctive relief as the court deems appropriate.
(f) Any person who wilfully violates any provision of this section or any regulation adopted by the commissioner pursuant to this section shall be guilty of a class C misdemeanor.

 

[Stitchex]

October 1st.....if Leos get banned, then I'm blaming my b-day bad luck =(.

 

[Khrysty]

oh geez...I just realized that my leos won't be the only ones affected by this bill...

One of my dogs is a wolf hybrid--damnit.

I swear, if this bill passes, I'm guarding Ollie with a shotgun and won't hesitate to fire at anyone attempting to seize him. After a friendly warning, of course.

 

[snowgyre]

I'm really surprised they banned Dendrobatids. That really doesn't make much sense, since poison arrow frogs lose their toxicity in captivity.

 

[Khrysty]

I'm really surprised they banned Dendrobatids. That really doesn't make much sense, since poison arrow frogs lose their toxicity in captivity.

Not a lot of these animals make a lot of sense...I doubt they have a really good grasp on what is dangerous and what isn't. :furious:

 

[cassadaga]

Your leos aren't endangered by this Bill.

This bill is only for Conneticut, right? I believe the power to regulate pets should be with the state, and not in a vague blanket federal ban. The majority of the animals on the list should not be kept by the public. How many people really think they can handle owning a tiger or chimpanzee, when there are thosands of people out there who can't even handle owning a dog? The bill seems to leave room for people with the right intentions and experience to obtain permits. Not a bad bill in my opinion, though there are several animals on the list I don't think need to be there.

 

[Khrysty]

My bad...they're not effected by THIS bill.

And is this one just CT? I didn't read that..

 

[Zynx_Keekeio]

I have no idea what this means but I know a guy who owns a burmese, a an andaconda and other things

 

[Zynx_Keekeio]

I'm really surprised they banned Dendrobatids. That really doesn't make much sense, since poison arrow frogs lose their toxicity in captivity.

I know it really doesn't!

 

[JordanAng420]

Aww man, I guess i'll have to cancel that order I made for the warthog. Jeez, and I was really looking foreward to her arrival... :main_laugh:

 

[Bellalee]

Definatly read that wrong.. I'm not sure what they are banning except for some wierd things?

 

[cassadaga]

Bearded Dragons don't seem to be on the list either.

 

[Khrysty]

Aww man, I guess i'll have to cancel that order I made for the warthog. Jeez, and I was really looking foreward to her arrival... :main_laugh:

She could have been Pumbaa's girlfriend!

 

[PacHerp]

Can someone please explain the details of this to me, and the community? When was this proposed? When could it take effect, or is it already in effect? I'd like a run down all in one post without having to spend 15 minutes reading through everything again to pick out the details we want....

 

[cassadaga]

It's basically saying that you can't keep anything like a tiger, chimp, warthog. It's nothing like HR669. The reptiles effected by it are the giant pythons, anacondas, venomous, and apparently dart frogs. Leopard geckos, bearded dragons, boa constrictors, ball pythons, corn snakes, all will still be legal.

Also, it only effects Conneticut.

 

[LizMarie]

I can't really say much of anything because New York City has already banned a bunch of exotics, including the iguana, ferrets among other things.
http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/downloads/pdf/zoo/zoo-animal-healthcode.pdf.

AND from what I've heard are thinking of banning things like elephants, etc that are used for entertainment ie. circus to eliminate the animal abuse.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/should-circus-elephants-be-banned/?hp

 

[PacHerp]

It's basically saying that you can't keep anything like a tiger, chimp, warthog. It's nothing like HR669. The reptiles effected by it are the giant pythons, anacondas, venomous, and apparently dart frogs. Leopard geckos, bearded dragons, boa constrictors, ball pythons, corn snakes, all will still be legal.

Also, it only effects Conneticut.

Thanks, I appreciate the clarification... I was getting a bit confused with all the legislation running around.

 

[Retribution Reptiles]

Britt i was just as confused. I read it over a few times and was like what?

 

[herpencounter]

I'm really surprised they banned Dendrobatids. That really doesn't make much sense, since poison arrow frogs lose their toxicity in captivity.

Same thing came to my mind.