Tremper New Morphs?

fuzzylogix

Carpe Diem
Messages
2,115
Location
Dallas, TX
I will try to get better pix of the galaxy.


are you even listening to what is being said? Abyssinian hasn't been proven out to be anything other than an eclipse. the "galaxy" is just a super snow eclipse, not a new morph. RT has now come out and stated that this is just a SSE. why are we still debating this?
 

RampantReptiles

New Member
Messages
2,488
Location
Canandaigua, NY
Did you read what Tony said?
All of the offspring also tended to be lighter than normal, which I speculated may be a genetic form of hypomelanism.

You are saying that the abyssinians are 100% not any different than eclipses. The fact that they are lighter in color, as told by the one that proved them out, is just not relevant?
I 100% agree that they are eclipses, but they are a variation of eclipse. Is that not possible? And if not, then give me a well explained reason why not. Or explain to me, with proof, why this whole thing is 100% false.
 

miiike

New Member
Messages
62
Location
Az
Did you read what Tony said?


You are saying that the abyssinians are 100% not any different than eclipses. The fact that they are lighter in color, as told by the one that proved them out, is just not relevant?
I 100% agree that they are eclipses, but they are a variation of eclipse. Is that not possible? And if not, then give me a well explained reason why not. Or explain to me, with proof, why this whole thing is 100% false.
Another thing to think about is if the hypo of the Aby is part of the Eclipse gene or if it's a different gene/line bred. I know a lot of the hets Tony had for sale looked a lot like Abys with normal eyes.
 

TokayKeeper

Evil Playsand User
Messages
718
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
whywontthis128467435222991026.jpg
 
Last edited:

Gazz

New Member
Messages
1,276
Location
UK
Did you read what Tony said?


You are saying that the abyssinians are 100% not any different than eclipses. The fact that they are lighter in color, as told by the one that proved them out, is just not relevant?
I 100% agree that they are eclipses, but they are a variation of eclipse. Is that not possible? And if not, then give me a well explained reason why not. Or explain to me, with proof, why this whole thing is 100% false.

IMO "Abyssinian" is just a Eclipse pastel, Pastel tones have a lighter tone and lavender banding. And that makes them as relivent as Hi-yellow normals and pastel normals to each other, At the end of the day there just normals, And the trait is't really big enought to warrent a morph name.

Pastel tone leo's.
http://uploads-preloved.com/uploads/userphotos/11/0512/3065998-202m.jpg
http://www.geckolist.com/photos/518_Eublepharis_macularius-Common_Leopard_Gecko.jpg
http://www.geckolist.com/photos/454_Eublepharis_macularius-Common_Leopard_Gecko.jpg
http://iherp.com/Gallery/90005/13865_23464_Large_aALB2x3RiRxu.jpg
 

SFgeckos

New Member
Messages
842
Location
CA
Somewhat off topic, but what ever happened to the "blue" morph? I'm not talking about the leopard gecko with the blue hematoma on the tail from his book years ago, but the "blue belly" morph?

Jon
 

Visit our friends

Top