Tony C
Wayward Frogger
- Messages
- 3,899
- Location
- Columbia, SC
Did you bother to read the thread? Several good reasons why culling is necessary have been given...
thats the point i was trying to get across(sorta). Wouldnt you consider SHTCTB as pure bred and hypo crosses as mixed?(terrible comparason) Breeders are still breeding them some dont show signs till there older which means all the pups they had(good breeders normally have 3-4 litters from a female) that can be easily 10+ pups that have the probelm that were sold off the be bred without being fixed and by that time there could be 3-6 generations of them. I suppose now i sound like im on the side to Cull my sig, i am not. He's defective yes but again i strongly believe it wasnt from bad genetics but from a early hatching, correct me if im wrong but thats not genetic. If somewhere down the line he shows sickness I'll definatly bring him to the vet and find out if he has internal probelms or anything of that and then is the only time I'll put him down. Who knows he maybe a cold male which wont breed anyways. I know its a bad choice to keep him alive but at this point im far to attached. If i had known all i did on this i probably would have re-thought purchasing him. Obviously Gerrick didnt see him as a genetic defect or he probably would have culled him He didnt mention that sig should be a pet only(which he will be) Still alot of un answered question on his part which i hope to get a response from today.Using dog breeding as a comparison; PLENTY of dog breeds have genetically linked defects just because people chose to continue to breed animals that had a certain look to them and ignored those defects. Responsible dog breeders spay or neuter animals that have these defects, something that is nigh impossible with leopard geckos. Even so, many breeds have issues that they are prone too that are based in their breed type: pugs and the like have breathing problems, golden retrievers, labs and boxers are prone to cancer and/or allergies/skin issues, dachshunds and beagles get back problems, etc.
Yes, I feed culls to my beardies. It provides a quick death, puts the body to good use instead of simply being discarded as trash, and provides the beardies with a chance to hunt and consume smaller lizards as they do in the wild. Culling is not enjoyable, but at least some good comes of it this way. You will never see one of those idiotic leo vs beardie/monitor/whatever videos from me...
I can garantee he will never leave me even if i fall ill he is one I would NEVER rehome him If i died i know any of my family members or friends(who are into herps) would take him.
You say its not enjoyable and a necessary evil but did ya have to say ya'd feed him to a your beardieD; isnt that a bit harsh? Sure its survival of the fitist but does it mean the weak get fed to the other captive bred, fed well and right animals?
well THATS gonna make lovely dreams=_lll; This is where i start to back away. When i was in school and in science class i took a F just coz i couldnt disect the frogs, worms, crayfish, and bugs. Dissecting somethings body after it passes on just goes compeltely against my code of ethics.Although I do sometimes get curious and perform a bit of dissection for my own edification if it is a particularly interesting or unusual condition that is prompting me to euthanize the animal- which can change exactly what is left and its appropriateness as a feeder for the predatory species I keep. Or, depending on exactly what I have done to the remaining tissue, sometimes it is just discarded. Some stains have antimicrobal properties that aren't great for the health of the beneficial gut fauna in the predator.
It just seemed like some were getting frustrated/angry (like Gregg M)
thats the point i was trying to get across(sorta). Wouldnt you consider SHTCTB as pure bred and hypo crosses as mixed?(terrible comparason) Breeders are still breeding them some dont show signs till there older which means all the pups they had(good breeders normally have 3-4 litters from a female) that can be easily 10+ pups that have the probelm that were sold off the be bred without being fixed and by that time there could be 3-6 generations of them. I suppose now i sound like im on the side to Cull my sig, i am not. He's defective yes but again i strongly believe it wasnt from bad genetics but from a early hatching, correct me if im wrong but thats not genetic. If somewhere down the line he shows sickness I'll definatly bring him to the vet and find out if he has internal probelms or anything of that and then is the only time I'll put him down. Who knows he maybe a cold male which wont breed anyways. I know its a bad choice to keep him alive but at this point im far to attached. If i had known all i did on this i probably would have re-thought purchasing him. Obviously Gerrick didnt see him as a genetic defect or he probably would have culled him He didnt mention that sig should be a pet only(which he will be) Still alot of un answered question on his part which i hope to get a response from today.
The only way to find out whether such a defect is genetic would be to breed and find out. But personally, I don't feel it's something that should be done unless you are willing to cull any potentially deformed hatchlings. In general, only animals that have no genetically known defects shoul
sorry deleted
A thought hit me tho. Why wouldnt the engimas spin be considered breeding worthy if people are producing spinners and head tilters and still breeding them? Isnt that genetic?
i dont mean to sound mm pushy? rude? but isnt it similar to a curled tail? Just you know its genetics? People still breed engimas with signs of the spin and there off spring show signs and there off spring do. Sure its not every time but isnt it the same?
Any animal with any type of defect should be culled as soon as the defect is spotted... Any defective geckos or snakes that hatch in my incubators will promptly be placed in one of the many varanid cages and will become a meal for the first monitor that spots them...
Dont get me wrong i do like the enigmas's(my favorite morph is the snow enigmas) But id never breed my engimas. just the thought that the hatchlings can be so problemed that they spin right out of the egg. And people still keep some of the spinners for breeding becuase of the amazing colors! Most wont but greeder boogers do. The only conclusion i can come to is coz the enigmas's are known as the "morph enhancers" i guess color and variation is worth the risks of the lives of them..... great morphs but i think only expercienced breeders show breed them. And to answer your bit on siggy and test breeding hes gonna be a pet only i dont think that finding out if its genetics or not is worth all the lives that could have to be culled. I can prevent that easily;DI couldnt agree with your more.There are ppl on this site who tell other ppl not too test breed a leo for different defects like a curled tail but they have no problem breeding enigmas who are full of defects..I cannot figure that out for the life of me?????
Dont get me wrong i do like the enigmas's(my favorite morph is the snow enigmas) But id never breed my engimas. just the thought that the hatchlings can be so problemed that they spin right out of the egg. And people still keep some of the spinners for breeding becuase of the amazing colors! Most wont but greeder boogers do. The only conclusion i can come to is coz the enigmas's are known as the "morph enhancers" i guess color and variation is worth the risks of the lives of them..... great morphs but i think only expercienced breeders show breed them. And to answer your bit on siggy and test breeding hes gonna be a pet only i dont think that finding out if its genetics or not is worth all the lives that could have to be culled. I can prevent that easily;D